Bharat Ratan- P V Kane disagreed with English nomenclature of Bharat as India .
Manu passages of the Rgveda where the singular is employed refer to the river Sindhu alone (as in Rg. II.15.6, IV.30.12, V.4.9 &c). In Rg. II.15.6 it is said that Indra made Sindhu flow northwards, This would obviously refer to the first part of the river flowing northward from the Himalayas. Panini uses the word 'Sindhu' as the name of a country in IV.3.93 ('Saindhava' means one who or whose ancestors lived in the Sindhu country). For the fluctuating limits of Aryawarta, vide H. of Dh. Vol. II pp. 11-16 and p. 1525, note 2483 above, where Rg. passages about Bharatas are set out and it is shown that the Puranas speak of Bharata-varsa as of the same extent as that of modern India and the name is said to have been due to Bharata, son of Dusyanta and Sakuntala. Bharatavarsa occurs in the Hathigumpha Inscripton of Kharavela (line 10 on p.79) which cannot be assigned to a date later than the 1st century B.C. It has been shown above (p.1016 n.1649) that Asoka in one of his edicts refers to his kingdom as Jambudvipa. Even in these days in the rather long sankalpa (declaration) at the beginning of a religious act in Maharastra, occur the words 'Jambudvipe Bharatavarse Bauddhavatare Godaverya daksine tire' &c. Therefore, the proper word to be used by us for our country should be Bharatavarsa.
It may be said that our culture and
civilization had throughout the past ages a geographical background. The
Constitution of India has recognized this in its very first Article which runs
'India that is Bharat, shall be a union of States'. In view of the fact,
however, that the words 'Hindu' and 'Indian' have been employed for centuries
by foreign as well as our own writers.
(volume 5 part 2 History of Dharmashashtra)
Comments
Post a Comment